Monday, December 20, 2010

How many armies do you own and how often do you cycle them out


How Many armies do you own and how Often do you switch them out.....Simple question isn't it.
I have 2 Armies sorta....... I have my Crimson Fist Space Marines Army made of elements of the 1st/ crusade company at half strength (64 models) Full 5th Company (100 models) and the 10th Company (around 80 models) so really 1 army is three and this is before the armour support. And My Witch Hunters.....I hate calling them that...I PLAY SISTERS of BATTLE! Over the years I lost track of how many sisters I actually have and can field....I know can field about 90 sisters in 6 troop choices and still fill the other slots....My perferred list is 107 models at 1850 all power armour no vehicles....such a sight, awesome when you can out number Eldar players at that point cost. But that is besides the point, my witch hunters....Consists of the Inquistorial Forces-Inquistors, Assassains, IST, orbital strikes, zealots, Penitent Engine and Arco fallagents (the last 3 really they fit a relgious aspect but....fail GW), My SISTERS of BATTLE, and my other section out of the Witch Hunter Codex....MY Adeptus Arbite army.
2 armies broken into 6 different armies played depending on my mood.....ok only 2 armies get real use- Crimson Fists (a mixture of all 3 companies) and Sisters of Battle.....

Sunday, December 12, 2010

Deep thoughts time!

Well Internets peeps,
I was thinking of building a third army, and now to choose
To be honest, I've built and played almost every list I can think of, barring moon doggies and the army of rons (space wolves and necrons for people who don't know me...)
so what to build, I'm looking at; Eldar, Khornate Marines, or Marines, but what chapter? blood angelish? redo my Iron Hands? 11th cavalry marines? or maybe chaos guard?
Suggestions? Comments? Death Threats? get in line....

Friday, December 3, 2010

Buncha crooks! How do we beat 'em?


Lately I have been noticing more people hijacking people's social media, and using it to post spam for their own site/product/phishing attempt. Not only is this reprehensible because it means that someone has to wade theough a stream of crap to get to what they want to see, but those without the knowledge/equipment are at risk for their computer, their data, and their money to be compromised.
I know that there are some measures to prevent this, but it seems extreme to require that a post require both signing in, and prooving that you are a real person, before you can participate. However, The vast number of innapropriate images on facebook pages seems to indicate a need for a more affirmative defense.

so my question is, how can we prevent the spam without makinf participating in a social media outlet a pain?

Thursday, December 2, 2010